Feedback

Did he have identity, vision, principles as a politician?

1. Identity :  He seemed lacking in self-consciousness as a politician who challenged the election for the first time. Most of all he was too self-assured and he failed to bring himeself to ordinary people's eye level. He sometimes acted like a teacher and sometimes like a chosen. True hero doesn't have to enthrone himself, neither wise guru to reveal himself. It was not a problem attributed to his clumsiness but a problem related to his own identity.

2. Vision : What was the difference between him and his opponents? It was the vision. The vision should have been more clarified and more magnified than the policies. Vision is a kind of dream and also a kind of sweet lie. Politician is another name of magician less than trickster because political visionary gathers up every hope and expects it to be realized by perseverance and many sacrifices that demand inevitably arbitration or negotiation.

3. Principles : Principles are principles when observed or sticked to with persistence. Among Integrity, sacrifice, consistency and so on...what belongs to him? To be honest, he was not that bad with regard to principles, which makes him deserve credit for a promising politican. But he could possibly be tempted and stand at crossroads on account of this first failure. What does he think? Anyhow, strategies can be changed, not principles.

------
A Hero, A Visionary, A Faithkeeper.